American notions of good writing

Over at the New York Review of Books, Tim Parks, a writer/translator from the UK recently published a summary of his trials and tribulations with American publishing houses “correcting” his English and imposing all kinds of inexplicable style changes.

My experience has been the same. When I wrote my book "Zukunftsenergien" in German, my editor found all kinds of things that needed improving on every page, and I agreed with all of the changes.

But when I wrote the English version of that book a year later, my American editor also made all kinds of changes on every page, much of which I did not agree with. For instance, where I would write “it has also been claimed” she would "correct" it to “it also has been claimed.” I remember sending her and the publisher a list of similar items showing the number of Google hits being very strongly in my favor.

Granted, the rules in English are less black and white than in German. Take commas, for instance – my editor changed commas all over the place, and when I asked her why, she said that the publisher generally did not like to use commas where they were not necessary, to which I could only reply that I did not either...

Perhaps more exposure to foreign languages would at least reveal to Americans that is quite uncommon in other languages for things that are perfectly native to nonetheless be attacked as ungrammatical. There is no equivalent in German, Dutch, or French of  the commotion surrounding split infinitives, prepositions at the end of the sentence, passive verbs, and a slew of other misconceived notions.

Anyway, read Parks' story for yourself.

Oder = and (continued again)

Still trying to get my head around German "oder":

Ein Beispiel hierfür wäre z.B. Ersatz von gesundheitsschädlichen ineffizienten Kochstellen durch sichere Kochherde oder der Bau einfacher Biogasanlagen, die mit Hausabfällen betrieben werden (siehe z.B.  www.niecrest.in).

Essentially, the German says (and I shorten): "one example is the use of inefficient cookers or the installation of biogas units running on household waste." Is it just me, or does that sound illogical? Don't we need to say, "Two examples are inefficient cookers and simple biogas units"?

I don't follow the logic of "one example is X or Y." For me, that would best be expressed as "X and Y are two examples."

Oder = and (continued)

Another great example of how the German "oder" actually means "and, not "or."

Wie geht es einem Bürger, der verpflichtet wird, einen bestimmten Standard einzuhalten, also zum Beispiel sein Auto umzurüsten, um eine „teure“ grüne Umweltplakette zu erhalten, damit er auch in der Innenstadt von München, Stuttgart, Berlin oder Heidelberg fahren darf.

What do people think when they are forced by law to comply with some standard, such as retrofitting their car so they can get an "expensive" green environmental sticker that allows them to enter downtown Munich, Stuttgart, Berlin, and Heidelberg?

A colleague writes:

"It makes sense [to translate "oder" as "or" here], since, I believe, the stickers are for each city, and having a sticker from one city doesn't necessarily mean you can enter another city...or does it?"

In fact, Germany has green, yellow, and red stickers for cars now, and those stickers apply across the nation. Wherever I get my green sticker, it is green throughout Germany – yet another example of how the Germans use "oder" incorrectly, thereby misleading readers.

Yes, you can use the same green sticker to get into downtown Munich, Stuttgart, Berlin, and (!) Heidelberg.